Crash Octopus – Board Game Review

by | Mar 8, 2025 | Board Game Reviews, Reviews

At the end of the day, I just like playing with toys. It’s that core concept that keeps pulling my attention back to dexterity games, and no company in hobby board gaming does dexterity games quite like Itten games. I’ve previously talked about Tokyo Highway, and today’s review I’m covering designer Naotaka Shimamoto’s follow-up, Crash Octopus

First thing I want to speak of, is the cost. It’s not something I generally talk about when I review a game, but in times where the cost is exceptional, it’s worth commenting on. Crash Octopus launched on Kickstarter for about $30 (CDN), plus $15 shipping. Since the Kickstarter, I’ve only seen it for sale on Board Game Bliss for an eye watering $70+ shipping. So when it popped up on Marketplace for $25, I jumped on the opportunity. And talking with the fellow who I bought it from, there was significant interest in the game.

I didn’t expect just how small the box was going to be. At $70, I expected so much more. While the box was packed well (unlike Tokyo Highway‘s large, mostly empty box), there was still some dissonance between the product I held in my hands, and the perceived value. If I had paid $70 for this box, I would have felt ripped off. There is a discussion to be had about how to value a game, how the cost of the game is more than the physical production. The time and effort of everyone involved with a project deserve to be fairly compensated, but I can’t shake the feeling of holding a small box and mentally figuring out how many hours I have to work to pay for the game.

Enough about economics. Let’s talk Crash Octopus. Aesthetically, Crash Octopus manages to evoke an incredible about of theme from a vibrant pink half dome and 8 wiggly tentacles. The boats are simple and effective, and the treasures you’re trying to collect are suitably eclectic. Itten knows how to utilize simplicity and minimalism to great effect to create a great looking game. Crash Octopus is vibrant and exudes charm and fun.

The game is contained within a blue string, with a line of white and black beads. The gameplay is simple, on your turn you either flick a treasure at your boat, or flick your anchor to reposition your boat. If you flick treasure and touch your boat, you get to load that treasure onto your boat. The first to collect all 5 different types of treasure is the winner. Every time someone loads treasure, a pink crab moves one bead forward. When it passes a black bead, an octopus attack occurs. Each player drops the dice on top of the octopus head, then, moving either a tentacle or the octopus head itself, depending on the die roll. Should that die manage to crash into any boat and send treasure skittering back onto the table, the octopus attack ends. The game continues until either the crab has stepped over all the beads, or, one player has collected all 5 treasure types.

My biggest criticism with Tokyo Highway, and most dexterity games in general, is that if players are sufficiently skilled, the game can last forever. Tokyo Highway in particular comes to a grinding halt as soon as one player makes a mistake, and is tasked with meticulously rebuilding the city before play can continue. Crash Octopus‘s game timer (the crab and the beads) keeps the game short. I can’t tell you how often I had 4 treasures on my boat, only to get bumped by the dice and my hard-earned treasures knocked off the boat, effectively undoing several turns of effort. The visual representation of how many treasures are left to be loaded makes Crash Octopus feel quick and breezy, for which I’m thankful.

The dexterity itself is fickle. You flick the treasures with a little flag, and some of the treasures are awful shapes for flicking. Like the goblet, which is a cone shape and has a tendency to roll in the exact wrong direction. Or the stick, which somehow always seems to be pointing at the wrong angle towards your ship, making a direct flick nigh impossible. The pieces are all delightfully challenging in their own way, and it’s hilarious when someone mis-judges their flick strength and sends their treasure crashing into their hull, scattering everything else.

Speaking of flicking, it’s kind of satisfying that you have to use a little flag to do all your flicking instead of your finger. Using a foreign tool flattens the play field right off the bat, rather than having your Crokinole expert friend having an advantage right off the bat. The flags are stiff and are fun to use, and like everything else that Itten makes, is well crafted.

Flicking bits of wood is a simple pleasure, and Crash Octopus is a quintessential example of a good dexterity game. A little push your luck, some space for the hail-mary clear across the table shot that gets everyone shouting and standing in their chair when you manage to land it, and some delightful spite when you use octopus to attack to knock your opponents hard earned treasures back into the ocean. Also, the instant karma when you accidentally smash your own ship with the die. It’s so simple, so pure, and so much fun.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

Lord of the Rings Fatigue: When Is Too Much of an IP a Bad Thing?

Lord of the Rings Fatigue: When Is Too Much of an IP a Bad Thing?

Ever since Embracer group acquired Middle Earth Enterprises, it feels like a deluge of Lord of the Rings games have hit the marketplace. In just the past few years there’s been The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers Trick-Taking Game,The Lord of the Rings: Duel for Middle-earth, There’s The Lord of the Rings: Fate of the Fellowship, You’ve got heavier titles like The Lord of the Rings: Foes of Middle-earth and The Lord of the Rings: Journeys in Middle-earth. And then there are others ,The Lord of the Rings: The Adventure Book Game, Exit: The Lord of the Rings, Spot It! The Lord of the Rings, and more! All these games circling the same source material, each trying to carve out its own little piece of Tolkien’s world.

At some point, I start to wonder: when does one of my favourite IPs being in a game stop being exciting and is actively hurting my intrest in it?

Kronologic: Paris 1920 – Board Game Review

Kronologic: Paris 1920 – Board Game Review

Last week I wrote about Turing Machine, a deduction puzzle that fascinated me with its cardboard computer but ultimately left me a little cold with the multiplayer experience. This week I’m talking about designers Fabien Gridel and Yoann Levet’s follow-up game, Kronologic: Paris 1920. It turns out the same designers have taken some of those clever ideas and turned them into something that feels much more like a game you’d actually want to sit down and play with other people.

Why do People Rate Games a “1”?

Why do People Rate Games a “1”?

Why do people give a game a 1 on BoardGameGeek?

It’s a question I’ve been mulling over for years, and one that tends to pop into my head whenever I’m browsing an upcoming release and trying to get a sense of what people are thinking. I scroll past the preview images, maybe skim a few comments, and then my eyes drift over to the rating… only to see that bar graph with a giant foot, the 1 ratings outnumbering every other number by a large margin. Also, why the heck are there ratings on this game if it isn’t even out yet? These 1s aren’t low scores from disappointed players, they aren’t thoughtful critiques explaining why something didn’t land. These 1s feel more of a punishment than anything else. And I always find myself wondering: what is that number actually trying to say?