Whalefall – Book Review

by | Sep 30, 2024 | Reviews, Book Reviews

Spoilers Ahead

Whalefall by Daniel Kraus came into my life via a skeet (a Bluesky post, for those who are unfamiliar with the term) by Elizabeth Hargrave, designer of Wingspan. It basically said “I put Whalefall on my holds list, then by the time it was available, I forgot why I wanted to read it. Going in blind is highly recommended for this book”. So I popped over to my library app, put the book on hold, and didn’t read a single word more about it.

Holy cow, what a great way to experience Whalefall. If you’ve liked my other book reviews, give this one a shot blind. It’s worth it.

For those who don’t heed that advice, here’s the rest of the review.

Photo by Emma Li on Pexels.com

Whalefall is a scientifically accurate thriller about a scuba diver who gets swallowed whole by a sperm whale. Bam, there it is. What a hook.

The book focuses on Jay Gardiner. Jay’s father was a local legend, the dive master. The ground he walked on was worshipped by anyone who knew anything about diving. His father, desperate to connect with his son, dragged him out on dive after dive after dive throughout the course of his childhood, and force-fed his expertise down his throat like a scuba diver foie gras. Naturally, this caused a bit of resentment between Jay and his father, and he left on less than good terms as soon as Jay was able to do so.

Jay returns to his hometown after his fathers’ death. He’s tired of local divers spitting at his feet. All they know is that Jay abandoned his father, the god of diving. Jay must be an insolent, disrespectful whelp to walk away from their hero. To prove his worth to the local diving community, and to himself, he’s taken it upon himself to recover his father’s remains from the bottom of the Pacific Ocean.

Once he’s successfully past the waves and submerged in the icy waters, he begins his search. He quickly comes across a giant squid! It’s remarkable, squids never come up to this depth, unless, they’re being hunted. A sperm whale emerges from the darkness, and sucks both the squid, and Jay into it’s gaping maw, whole.

What follows is Jay’s fight for survival. He moves his way back and forth from the whale’s stomachs, suffers untold traumas, all while hearing the whale’s (or his fathers) voice inside his head, offering nuggets of wisdom, and urging Jay to use his knowledge to escape before his oxygen runs out.

Photo by Mau00ebl BALLAND on Pexels.com

Now, here’s the thing. I come from a landlocked province, small town boy, raised by a single mother. I have no experience with diving, no reverence for the ocean, and no real complex feelings towards a father. And yet, despite having virtually no personal connection to this tale at all, I was utterly enthralled. The story bounces back and forth from Jay’s fight for survival, to memories of his childhood.

Whalefall can be summarized as “Daddy issues inside a whale”, and that wouldn’t be an entirely unfair summary. But it really misses the absolutely thrilling nature of the story. The story of Jay’s fight for survival is gruesome, exciting, and gripping. I was so caught up in suspense that I literally almost burned my family’s dinner because I got pulled into reading ‘just one more chapter’ as the meat cooked in my frying pan. If that’s not a ringing endorsement, I don’t know what is.

Daniel Kraus has produced an absolutely enthralling tale, and one that I recommend without hesitation. I loved the detailed descriptions of what it might actually be like in the inside of a whale, from the gritty floor of squid beaks to the existence of four stomachs. It’s obvious that Kraus has done his homework, and I look forward to reading more of his novels. And, the cover is awesome. I’d hang a poster of that in my room.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

Lord of the Rings Fatigue: When Is Too Much of an IP a Bad Thing?

Lord of the Rings Fatigue: When Is Too Much of an IP a Bad Thing?

Ever since Embracer group acquired Middle Earth Enterprises, it feels like a deluge of Lord of the Rings games have hit the marketplace. In just the past few years there’s been The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers Trick-Taking Game,The Lord of the Rings: Duel for Middle-earth, There’s The Lord of the Rings: Fate of the Fellowship, You’ve got heavier titles like The Lord of the Rings: Foes of Middle-earth and The Lord of the Rings: Journeys in Middle-earth. And then there are others ,The Lord of the Rings: The Adventure Book Game, Exit: The Lord of the Rings, Spot It! The Lord of the Rings, and more! All these games circling the same source material, each trying to carve out its own little piece of Tolkien’s world.

At some point, I start to wonder: when does one of my favourite IPs being in a game stop being exciting and is actively hurting my intrest in it?

Kronologic: Paris 1920 – Board Game Review

Kronologic: Paris 1920 – Board Game Review

Last week I wrote about Turing Machine, a deduction puzzle that fascinated me with its cardboard computer but ultimately left me a little cold with the multiplayer experience. This week I’m talking about designers Fabien Gridel and Yoann Levet’s follow-up game, Kronologic: Paris 1920. It turns out the same designers have taken some of those clever ideas and turned them into something that feels much more like a game you’d actually want to sit down and play with other people.

Why do People Rate Games a “1”?

Why do People Rate Games a “1”?

Why do people give a game a 1 on BoardGameGeek?

It’s a question I’ve been mulling over for years, and one that tends to pop into my head whenever I’m browsing an upcoming release and trying to get a sense of what people are thinking. I scroll past the preview images, maybe skim a few comments, and then my eyes drift over to the rating… only to see that bar graph with a giant foot, the 1 ratings outnumbering every other number by a large margin. Also, why the heck are there ratings on this game if it isn’t even out yet? These 1s aren’t low scores from disappointed players, they aren’t thoughtful critiques explaining why something didn’t land. These 1s feel more of a punishment than anything else. And I always find myself wondering: what is that number actually trying to say?