Bandido – Small Box, Big Table

by | Nov 4, 2023 | Board Game Reviews, Reviews

I’m often looking for games that travel well, which generally leads me to amassing many games that come in tiny boxes. But an important aspect to a travel game is how much table space it takes up. A few times I’ve packed a small box game into my backpack, and pulled it out at an airport or pub, only to realize that the game demands much more table space than we anticipated. This is the case with Bandido by Martin Nedergaard Andersen and published by Helvetiq.

Bandido starts with a light-security prisoner card with 6 tunnels extending out from its starting point. The goal of the game is to close off all the tunnels. If you do, you win! If the deck runs out, players all lose.

Players get 3 cards in their hand, each one depicting various shapes of tunnels that they can place wherever they want, as long as no tunnels abut a wall or overlap existing tunnels. A turn consists of simply playing a card, then drawing a card to refill your hand. Players continue to play until they win or lose.

I received Bandido as a stocking stuffer from my wife for Christmas. She always tries to buy me some kind of small game for my stocking, as she knows I love exploring new games. Bandido lends itself incredibly well to being stuffed in a sock, as the box fits in the palm of your hand.

Being a coop game, it offers a low-barrier gameplay experience, drawing in family members who may be nervous about learning all the rules to a competitive game, again, the perfect game to have around the holidays when you may find yourself rubbing elbows with people who don’t automatically default to playing a board game when they have a moment of free time.

Bandido can be lost or won within the first few turns. If you have the cards that combine or end tunnels, you can make short work of the task. On the other hand, if the only cards available to you are the ones with several open ends, you’ll find the game quickly spiral out of control.

You need to be aware when placing cards. Much like in Carcassonne, you can create situations in which a tunnel could technically be placed, but the specific orientation of tunnels may no longer exist. In which case you’ll just keep playing cards, spinning off the side of the table, drawing cards until the deck runs out and you lose.

Speaking of loss, unlike other cooperative games that have multiple loss conditions and a single way to win, Bandido has one way to win and one way to lose. Winning happens when you close off all the tunnels, and losing happens when you’ve run out of cards. Again, quick and simple to explain.

Unfortunately, because the cards often feature several tunnel openings, placing cards often makes the board state worse, and combining tunnels can be an impossible task, unless you got lucky. And that’s where the game comes down for me, if you’re lucky you can win and if you’re unlucky you’ll lose. I never felt smart or clever when I managed to combine tunnels, just lucky that I pulled the right cards. My wins didn’t feel earned, and I never felt like any amount of clever play would overcome poor card draws.

Bandido is a little game that can travel well, and that aspect alone gives it some credit. Pulling it out at a family gathering is a great way to introduce what a simple little deck of cards can do in this modern board game hobby, and even introduce what a cooperative game even is. In the end, it’s a game that I’d move on from quite quickly, but I was happy that it existed in my stocking while I was at my in-laws for the holidays.

2 Comments

  1. orangerful

    I enjoy this game when playing with non-gamers – the rules are so easy to explain and get started and it’s been a hit each time. I swear, the first game we always end up winning in a couple of turns so they we start a second game and that shuffle leads up to losing LOL.

    One of the things I always find amusing is the translation on the back of the box for the Spanish. There’s like a couple paragraphs in English describing the gameplay but the Spanish is like one sentence? It’s odd.

    Reply
    • MeepleandtheMoose

      Non-gamers is the perfect audience for Bandido. Super simple, just enough to whet their appetite, then BAM hit em with a Pandemic or Burgle Bros to really seal the deal 😀

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

Lord of the Rings Fatigue: When Is Too Much of an IP a Bad Thing?

Lord of the Rings Fatigue: When Is Too Much of an IP a Bad Thing?

Ever since Embracer group acquired Middle Earth Enterprises, it feels like a deluge of Lord of the Rings games have hit the marketplace. In just the past few years there’s been The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers Trick-Taking Game,The Lord of the Rings: Duel for Middle-earth, There’s The Lord of the Rings: Fate of the Fellowship, You’ve got heavier titles like The Lord of the Rings: Foes of Middle-earth and The Lord of the Rings: Journeys in Middle-earth. And then there are others ,The Lord of the Rings: The Adventure Book Game, Exit: The Lord of the Rings, Spot It! The Lord of the Rings, and more! All these games circling the same source material, each trying to carve out its own little piece of Tolkien’s world.

At some point, I start to wonder: when does one of my favourite IPs being in a game stop being exciting and is actively hurting my intrest in it?

Kronologic: Paris 1920 – Board Game Review

Kronologic: Paris 1920 – Board Game Review

Last week I wrote about Turing Machine, a deduction puzzle that fascinated me with its cardboard computer but ultimately left me a little cold with the multiplayer experience. This week I’m talking about designers Fabien Gridel and Yoann Levet’s follow-up game, Kronologic: Paris 1920. It turns out the same designers have taken some of those clever ideas and turned them into something that feels much more like a game you’d actually want to sit down and play with other people.

Why do People Rate Games a “1”?

Why do People Rate Games a “1”?

Why do people give a game a 1 on BoardGameGeek?

It’s a question I’ve been mulling over for years, and one that tends to pop into my head whenever I’m browsing an upcoming release and trying to get a sense of what people are thinking. I scroll past the preview images, maybe skim a few comments, and then my eyes drift over to the rating… only to see that bar graph with a giant foot, the 1 ratings outnumbering every other number by a large margin. Also, why the heck are there ratings on this game if it isn’t even out yet? These 1s aren’t low scores from disappointed players, they aren’t thoughtful critiques explaining why something didn’t land. These 1s feel more of a punishment than anything else. And I always find myself wondering: what is that number actually trying to say?