Beast is a hidden movement game, designed by Aron Midhall, Elon Midhall, and Assar Pettersson, and published by Studio Midhall. As many Kickstarter darlings are, it’s an absolutely gorgeous production. The box art depicts a massive hydra before a lone warrior, weapon drawn. The scene promises an epic encounter with a mystical beast, a foe that needs to be overcome in the depths of the forest. The characters are lovely acrylic standees, and the board is littered with gold highlighted screen printed critter meeples (sheep, boars, and bears). The art on the cards is dark and mysterious, and each beast feels like it has an entire mythos behind them. A fable, passed down in whispers around campfires from generation to generation, which is exactly the feeling you want from this game.
The gameplay, on the other hand, is plodding at best. Beast is all about a hidden movement dance. You’ve got these hunters, dreaming of glory, and a beast, sneaking around like a Predator. In its mind, you’re already dead, you just haven’t realized it yet. But wait, it’s not all excitement and epic clashes. You know that feeling when you’re stuck in traffic, and it’s like the universe is conspiring against your progress? That’s how Beast makes me feel. It’s slower than a molasses, drafting cards and deciding on which top and bottom actions to use takes longer than trying to start a fire with nothing but a stick and string. You saw it work in a movie once, right?
Beast should be simple and straightforward. Players draft a hand of action cards, add them to their hand of personal cards, then, on their turn, play one or two cards and execute the actions on the cards. But Hunters need to confer with each other on what each player can do, and what they think the beast can do, all while be beast player sits by, smirking, or, bored out of their skull waiting for their turn to do anything. Then, when all the hunters have finally executed their turns, it’s finally the beast players turn to make the table wait while they consider every possibility. After every beast turn, the hunters need to re-confer with each other, as each action they take is precious. There’s a lot of time just spent considering everything that you as a player can do, and trying to guess at what your partners and opponents can accomplish on their turns.
The dance between the beast and the hunters is exciting at first. As the beast slinks in the shadows, circling its prey, the hunters take their first tentative steps out of their villages, moving in the direction they think the beast has moved to. Very quickly, it becomes clear that this dance is actually a frustrating game of cat and mouse. Each of the hunters can move one or maybe two steps with each of their cards, while the beast seems to get 2 to 4 movement on average. On the face of it, that doesn’t seem that bad, but at the end of the day, the hunters can move 10ish spaces between them, while the beast player can move like 12 spaces all on their own. Ideally, the hunters are spread out to cover more ground, but this leaves at least one hunter removed from the action, taking an entire day to cross the map only to have the beast slip by them going in the other direction.
I was endlessly frustrated by the hide and seek mechanics. There were scenarios where I had 100% logically deduced where the beast was, and was standing on that same spot, and had attack cards in my hand, but because I didn’t hold a card with the ‘seek’ keyword in my hand, I couldn’t reveal the beast to attack it. In contrast to that, the only thing the Beast needs to do to attack is to play one of those attack cards. Doing so, reveals their location, but to become hidden again, all they have to do is simply move again. It feels unfair for the hunters to require a keyword to find the beast when the beast doesn’t need a keyword to hide again. Coupled with my criticism above where the beast generally has so much more movement options than the players, it makes for a slippery and frustrating experience.
Beast gives both the hunters and the beast player plenty of tools to cut their own path. For every strategy, there’s a counter. For every boon one side gets, there’s a way for the other side to mitigate it. For the beast, it’s not terribly difficult to accrue enough grudge to be fully evolved and have all their skills unlocked by the final night. With all of your skills at your disposal, the beast is exponentially stronger than it was at the start of the game. The hunters, on the other hand, struggle to gain enough grudges to unlock any of their abilities. Add to that, the grudges are used to activate most of the items that are needed to counter the beastly talents. And yes, many of the beastly talents also cost grudges, but the Beast has so many more options to earn grudges over the course of a single day. The opportunity cost for using a grudge for the hunters is significantly higher doing similar things as the beast player.
I found the asymmetry of the beast and the hunters to be odd and frustrating. The beast gets grudges for killing the critters on the board, but the humans don’t get grudges for hitting the beast or killing its summons. If the beast kills one of the players, the beast gets to take one of their cards, and that player has to sit out for the rest of the round, but if the players hit the beast, then hitting the beast is the reward in itself. A lot of “I can do this, but you can’t” when explaining the rules continued to sow discord in my heart.
Speaking of dying, while there isn’t true player elimination in Beast, it’s possible for players to be knocked out of a whole day. In our most recent game, Bigfoot died on the third day, and was forced to just sit, and spectate. Maybe they can make suggestions for what the remaining two hunters should do, but still. Relegated to the sidelines, no agency of their own. Defeated hunters do recover at the dawn of the next day, but when each day takes at least 30 – 45 minutes to play through, that’s a lot of time to wait around with nothing to do.
One time, near the end of a round, I played the last card of my hand, and ended my turn on a town. Then the beast moved two spaces with their last card, ending their turn on my spot, revealing themselves, but with no one with any cards remaining, the round came to an end. As an upgrade, the beast spent their grudges to improve their damage, and then in the following day, the beast (who always gets the first action), used their first action to attack me, and consumed one of their ancient power to increase their attack, dealing a whopping 3 damage to me, knocking me out for the entirety of the final day. Not only did the beast get to steal one of my cards as a reward for killing me, but now the beast had 6 less hunter actions to worry about. I honestly stepped away from the table at that point, as I was done and out for the rest of the game. I had no investment to watch the song and dance of the beast and the remaining two hunters for the next hour. When a game has players disengaged and walking away from the table, that’s trouble.
I understand why all of these aspects exist, and for those who love the game, I fully understand why. For every complaint about a mechanic I have, there’s a good reason for that mechanic to exist. There’s always a strategy that I could pursue to face my struggles, and these problems I have with Beast will probably fade away with experience. I appreciate games that reward repeat plays, but I really struggle when my first impression of a game is so sour. It’s got such potential buried under layers of frustration, an the uneven playing field is rife with leaving first time players with a bad impression. For those who love Beast, I’m so glad you found your joy, but personally, it’s a game that I’m moving on from, and won’t be looking back.
I have very little experience with One vs. Many games. I’ve played Scotland Yard once, Betrayal at House on the Hill once, and Pandemic with the bio-terrorist expansion once. All of these experiences have been fine, but none of them have inspired a love for the genre for me. Bear backed the Beast Kickstarter, and has been eagerly anticipating its release, so, for this week’s game night, Beast was the game we played.
How to Play
Beast’s rulebook is deceptively thin, considering how much asymmetry the game holds. As a ‘1 vs many’ game, there are two halves of the conflict that need to be taught, as both sides need to know what powers and limitations the other has in order to effectively strategize.
With 6 different beasts, 6 different hunters, and 4 different contracts included in the game, there’s plenty of variety to choose from. We chose to follow the suggested first time set up with “The Great Cleansing” contract, with the Beast Fangrir being hunted by Helga and Assar. The gameplay is pretty simple, each of the characters has a set of ability cards, then, each player will draft 4 of the 16 action cards. Each card has a symbol in the centre, either red or blue, along with two potential actions at the bottom. The top action is what the heroes get to do if they play that card, while the bottom action is what the beast gets to do if they play that card.
The goal of the game is outlined on the contract, and for The Great Cleansing, the Beast had to kill two of the three villagers on the map. The hunters had to either survive until night of the third day, or, slay the beast.
The Beast is often “hidden”, with their figure on the map only denoting the Beast’s last known position. Whenever the beast moves, they play a direction card face down. If a hunter or villager manage to happen upon the Beast’s trail, the beast must put down a trail token. The Hunters have an ability to “search” a location, which, if the Beast is in that location, becomes revealed, and is now attackable. The Beast can become hidden again as soon as it moves from its spot.
Every round starts with the Beast taking their turn. Every player can play one or two cards on their turn, but only one card of each colour. No doubling up on red actions here! Around and around players take actions until someone passes. There is a rule stating that you cannot pass if someone has less action cards than you do. The round only ends once all players pass in succession.
After all players have passed, they enter the evening phase, where, both Beast and Hunters get to spend the grudges they earned during the day to unlock new abilities. Once all players have completed their evening phase, the morning begins with another action card draft. The game ends when either side of the conflict achieves their goal.
First Impressions
Asymmetric games are always difficult to grasp on the first play. Each character, Beast, and contract has their own nuances, and I can’t always foresee a character’s strengths or shortcomings and how they’ll play into the chosen scenario, so I’m always thankful when the game offers character suggestions for first time gamers to get into the experience quickly.
On the very first turn, I was able to deuce where the beast had moved to with 100% accuracy, moved into that spot, and hunted him successfully. This hit left Fangrir scared. He spent the rest of the round moving and attacking the bare minimum to accomplish his daily goal, then running away again, not leaving him exposed for a single turn.
At the start of the second day, Fangrir got a Beastly talent that allowed him to react to our Hunt card. When one of us played the Hunt card, he could spend a grudge to instantly move to an adjacent location, rendering one of our hunt cards worthless. There was one point during the second day when I was standing on the location and was 100% positive that I was on the same location as the Beast, but I didn’t have any cards with a Search ability, so, there was nothing I could do.
We chose to end the game after the second night, as it was getting quite late. It took us about 3 hours to set up, learn, and play through 2 full rounds of Beast. A lot of that length of play comes down to analysis paralysis. Both sides have a lot to consider on their turns, and when you’re staring at a hand of 8 cards trying to figure out which two you want to play, it can really slow you down. One of the games that Beast reminded me of was INIS, which is another drafting game. I imagine much like INIS, Beast gets better on repeat plays, when all players know what ability cards are available, and are more intimately familiar with both roles limitations and powers.
Bear was adamant that if we had continued into the third round, he would have taken the victory, but I’m not so sure. We needed to hit Fangrir 3 more times, while Fangrir needed to cross half the map and attack a villager. Between the two hunters, and Bears’ cautious nature, I don’t think he would have been able to pull it off without either running out of steam, or, getting pummled on the one turn he left himself vulnerable. It would really have come down to the cards that got drafted, and the reactions/items/beastly talents that would swing the game in either direction.
My big frustration with Beast came with the Beast’s hidden/reveal mechanic. I really disliked that all the Beast has to do to become hidden again is simply move, but for the hunters to find the Beast, they need to play a card with the “search” keyword. It was superbly annoying that I knew exactly where the beast was, I was standing right on top of it, but I just didn’t have a search card to play, leaving us at a weird stalemate. I feel that if I need to search to find the beast, then the beast should have a corresponding ‘hide’ keyword, or, I should be able to just attack a space that I think (or know) that they’re, and if I’m right, do damage to you, and if I’m wrong, get a punishment, like slay one of the pigs and give the Beast the corresponding grudge. Just, more freedom to actually progress toward the hunter win condition.
I don’t like games that handcuff you. The situation of “The goal of the game is to kill the beast, but you can only attack him if he’s revealed, and you only get one reveal card per round. Also, the Beast has a reaction card that nullifies that card once” really frustrated me. I suspect the reaction card to nullify the hunt card one time would be less powerful in a 4 player game, but it felt very swingy in our game, and I can only imagine would be pretty killer in a two player game.
I can really see how Beast rewards experience. The more we know what cards are in the deck, the better we can control the draft and what ability cards even get given to the beast, the better we can all find those crazy combos that make us feel powerful. I am really looking forward to learning what really makes those hunters different, and what surprises the other Beasts have in store for us. I also really wonder if that same mission would be harder or easier if we didn’t just follow the suggested Hunter setup. All things I’m excited to discover!
Number of plays: 2 Designer: Maxime Tardif Release Year: 2023 Mechanics: Tableu building, Card Drafting, Hand Management
A prototype of Earth was provided by the publisher for review purposes
Introduction
Earth, designed by Maxime Tardif and published by Inside Up Games, is an engine building, hand management, tableau building game for 1 – 5 players. In this post I’ll be focusing on the multiplayer mode of play, which generally takes between 60 to 90 minutes to complete. Earth is on Kickstarter until March 7th, so if anything I say below interests you, check out their fundraising project here!
And if you’re interested in the solo game, you can find my review of it here!
How to Play
In Earth you are an island, with a distinct and unique ecosystem. Your goal is to plant flora into a 4 x 4 tableau that will grant you special abilities and amass points, as its the player with the most points who gets the distinction of being the best island.
Every player starts with 3 double sided cards, an island, an ecosystem, and a climate. These cards will dictate how many cards and soil you start with, grant you a special ability to use throughout the game, and give you an end game scoring condition that only you can fill.
In the centre of the table four Fauna cards are laid out, each offering a unique goal (such as “have 6 plans with 3 or less cube spots” or “have 4 cards completely full, all their growth and plant tracks complete”). Should you accomplish any of the requests of the fauna cards, you’ll earn victory points. The first player to satisfy each one will earn slightly more than those who come after them. On this board two more ecosystem cards are laid down, offering even more end game scoring conditions that all players can fulfill.
Now the stage is set and everyone draws their initial hand of cards based off their individual island. Some will draw 10 cards and need to compost 4 of them, others will draw 3 cards, but get extra soil to start with. Either way, each player will have an asymmetric starting position with their own benefits and drawbacks
The active player chooses one of the four actions (Planting, Composting, Watering, and Growing). That player gets a major benefit based off that action while all other players get a minor benefit. Then all players trigger any abilities on their cards from top left to bottom right that match the colour of that action. Once resolved, the next player becomes the active player, and the game continues in this fashion until someone has completed their 16 card tableau and triggers the end of the game. Play continues so all players had the same number of turns, then the final scores are tallied.
Points in Earth come from a wide variety of places. Cards in your tableau have a base VP, cards in your event space usually have a negative VP, you get 1 VP per card in your compost pile,1 VP per plant cube in your tableau, 1 VP per growth token, unless the canopy has been placed, in which case you gain the completion bonus instead, Terrain cards in your tableau may offer VPs, the Fauna board offers VPs to those who completed them, and finally, the ecosystem cards will offer VPs as well.
Review
Earth is a rare game where the player interactions aren’t negative; you’re not trying to cut your opponents down or steal their resources to gain a better position for yourself. Instead, there’s a beneficial relationship here. When you choose an action all the other players gain a fraction of the benefit you received, and everyone gets to trigger any cards of that colour.
With over 360 unique cards in the main plant deck, there’s no real way to hate draft or otherwise stifle your opponents, other than capitalize on their weaker positions. If you see they’re low on soil, it may be in your interest to choose the Plant action as they may not be able to fully utilize the benefit. Likewise, if you notice that both your opponents are full on cubes but you aren’t, consider taking the action that gives everyone cubes and laugh as they groan!
You won’t get far in Earth if you’re playing this way however. The goal is to grow the best ecosystem you can, and that is only achieved when you can create and maintain a well balanced engine. Having too many cards that produce cubes is a detriment when you’ve reached your capacity. I’ve really enjoyed playing cards into my tableau that create a self-sustaining ecosystem; the first card earns me a soil, the second card let’s me compost a card from my hand. The third card lets me pick up a card from the deck, and my fourth card discards a soil and a compost to earn 2 cubes and 1 growth. It’s so satisfying when you can align your abilities to create the perfect perpetual motion machine.
Earth has been billed as Terraforming Mars mixed with Wingspan. While it has much more in common with the latter, I can see the comparisons to both. Like Wingspan, you have 4 actions to choose from on your turn, and the action you take dictates which aspects of your engine will trigger. It also features point scoring cards based on various features (like 3pts per plant with a colour in its name) which Earth does its very best to inform players of the likely-hood of obtaining cards by including how many cards in the deck include that feature. I’m curious as to how that would change with future expansions, if diluting the deck would modify those odds, or if every expansion that adds cards to the Plant desk will need to maintain the appropriate ratios of cards.
Also like Wingspan the cards of your engine trigger in a specific order, making where and when you place them important. While some will agonize over the loss of efficiency when you’re forced to put a card that scores points based on being adjacent to other cards along the edge, it absolutely does cut down on some analysis paralysis. Considering you’ll be triggering the abilities on your cards on every players turn, it’s nice that you can just start from the top left and go to the bottom right, collecting and converting resources. This step can happen simultaneously and helps cut down on the play time.
While the comparisons to other games like Wingspan are apt, another mechanic I want to touch on is the benefits players give to each other on their turns. Harkening back to games like Puerto Rico or Race for the Galaxy, when the active player picks an action they get a major benefit while all the other players get a minor benefit. This system manages to keep all the players at the table involved, as their actions directly affect and benefit you. It’s wonderful when you’re agonizing over your cards trying to figure out which two you’ll want to plant but being constrained by your low soil supply, then the player before you takes an action that pours soil onto your player board. I really enjoy this positive player interaction and think it’s one of the more interesting parts of this design.
Earth has been fun to discover. I love the slight amount of asymmetry from the start and more as each player grows their engine in a different direction. I particularly enjoyed my friends as all the pieces started to fall into place. When deciding on their first hand of cards and exclaiming “oh! OH! But then… ooooohhh!”, their excitement was contagious. if you’ve enjoyed games like Wingspan or Terraforming Mars in the past, I’m willing to bet that you’ll enjoy Earth. Even if you don’t, at the very least you’ll get to enjoy some really lovely nature photography and learn about some fascinating plants. Like how cool the bleeding tooth fungus looks!
If you’re in the market for a medium weight engine builder that’s high in discovery and low in direct conflict, Earth will not disappoint!
Designer: Lance Hill Artists: Matthew Ebisch Release Year: 2022 Mechanics: Card drafting, set collection
A copy of the game was provided by the publisher for review purposes.
Introduction
OT Fantasy Draft is a up-coming card drafting and set collection game by Lance Hill, published by Funhill Games. In OT Fantasy Draft you’re trying to assemble the very best team of Old Testament characters, all of whom will offer a wide variety of ways to score points and other special abilities.
How to Play
The box of OT Fantasy Draft contains only a single deck of 54 cards, and a paper pad of score sheets. To begin, shuffle the entire deck and deal everyone two cards. Each player returns one card to the bottom of the desk, and keeps the other one secret. Deal out 5 cards to the centre of the table and decide who is going first.
The first player simply takes one card from the draft line and places it in front of them. They then refill the draft line so that it has 5 cards for the next player. Once everyone has taken a turn the whole draft line is discarded and refilled with 5 new cards. The player who went last in the previous round goes first in the subsequent round.
Round and round players take turns pulling players, things, and locations into their team, hoping to be the player with the most points at the end of the game.
The trick of the game is that every card has rules or effects that will affect other cards in your draft line. Samson for instance will destroy Grain, Lion, Philistia, and Temple, but give you points for each card that Samson destroys. Deborah on the other hand doubles the total points of all drafted women. The key is to assemble a team that synergizes well to score the most points.
Review
OT Fantasy Draft is a quick and fun card game. The rules are light and while it’s dead simple to play (literally pick a card on your turn. That’s it), the challenge lies in assembling the best lineup, which may be difficult if you find a man eating lion on your team. Seeing as OT Fantasy Draft is just 54 cards (and a paper score pad), this game is perfect for travelling. As long as you have a place where you can lay out 5 cards for the draft line, you could play standing up, holding the rest of the cards in your hands. Although for optimum comfort I do recommend a table and chair.
I’ve had odd successes and failures with pitching OT Fantasy Draft to players. The non-religious recoil and dismiss the game entirely, I’m sure no doubt due to the perception that Christian themed media is inherently poor quality and exists only to proselytize to its audience.
On the other hand, playing OT Fantasy Draft with some friends of faith, we had a ball. Laughing at the connections and interactions of the cards, like Abraham, who destroys Issac or Job, who destroys all things. The joy came from our shared knowledge and the callbacks to the classic stories out of The Bible.
I was reminded of the first time I played the Battlestar Galactica board game (before I watched the show) and my friends spent the whole game shouting quotes at each other and referencing events from the show that I just didn’t get. It was a fine experience, but without that cultural context most of the flavour was lost. I can only imagine all the references and interactions of OT Fantasy Draft would feel arbitrary to someone who hasn’t done their required reading.
It’s nearly impossible to separate OT Fantasy Draft from another drafting game, Fantasy Realms by Bruce Glassco. Both games have decks full of unique cards with varied scoring capabilities and interactions between the cards in your hand. Where Fantasy Realms has a generic fantasy theme OT Fantasy Draft employs characters, locations, and items from the Old Testament. If you’ve played Fantasy Realms before, the complex interactions of opposing cards in your draft line will feel very familiar.
While I’m not the biggest fan of the gridiron background on all the Location cards, I do like the logo style artwork on all the items, and all the human characters in various football poses, like Moses catching a dove like a wide receiver, or Saul, absolutely dunking on another player. I imagine those who reside in the Venn diagram of Christians, football fans and board game aficionados will be absolutely stoked with this product.
If you have a group of friends who know the Old Testament Bible stories, I’d recommend OT Fantasy Draft. The familiar theme and characters can be a useful bridge for someone who many be intimated by modern games. Experienced players will have an edge over new players, but I doubt that will be a concern for many people. With games so short it’s easy to just reshuffle the deck and play again and being so portable I reckon that you could get 3 or 4 games played in the pews during a Sunday morning service. Not that you should, mind you.
Number of plays: 2 Designer: Maxime Tardif Release Year: 2023 Mechanics: Tableu building, Card Drafting, Hand Management
A prototype of Earth was provided by the publisher for review purposes
Introduction
Earth, designed by Maxime Tardif and published by Inside Up Games, is an engine building, hand management, tableau building game for 1 – 5 players. In this post I’ll be focusing on the solo mode of play, which takes about an hour to complete. Earth is currently on Kickstarter so if anything I say below interests you, check out their fundraising project here!
How to play
In the solo game of Earth you are pitted against an AI named Gaia who is controlled by a small deck of 6 cards. The setup is mostly the same as the multiplayer game; shuffle the (massive) deck of 360 unique cards, then draw an island, climate, and ecosystem card, which will form your asymmetric starting powers and personal end game victory point goals. These cards are double sided to offer plenty of variety. Four Fauna cards are laid out on the common central board, and two public ecosystem cards give all players further victory points to work towards. After that, you’re ready to start.
On your turn you pick one of the four available actions (Planting, Composting, Watering, and Growing). After taking the benefit the action affords, you activate any cards that have played that contain the same colour as the action you just took. Then Gaia gets a small benefit based on that action.
For Gaia’s turn, draw the top card from her deck and follow the instructions. Most cards will have you adding points to her board while simultaneously giving you a small benefit and activating all the cards in your tableau of a specific colour. A large part of the game is ensuring you’re ready to capitalize on whatever benefit Gaia offers you.
Back and forth you and Gaia play until either you have 16 cards (in a 4 x 4 grid) in your personal tableau or Gaia plays all 6 of her cards twice. Whoever amasses the highest score is the winner.
Review
Earth was a fast game to learn and play. I found it helpful to know some of the design inspirations behind the systems (it was sold to me as cross between Terraforming Mars and Wingspan), but what I didn’t know about was the Puerto Rico-esque action following mechanism where the active player gets to choose an action and gets a big benefit while all the other players at the table get a small benefit. This interaction is simulated well in the solo game, as Gaia will trigger many of your abilities. Knowing what cards still remain in her deck is akin to looking over at another player and estimating which of the available actions they’ll take on.
While it was fairly simple to grasp the rules, I was somewhat overwhelmed with information when I started my first game. Trying to choose the Island card that I would use, and which 2 of the 10 cards in my hand to compost was a bit much. Every plant card has around 7 different features to consider (cost, base points, ecosystems, plant type, tree size, plant cube spots, and potential bonus action), so parsing 10 cards right at the start can be a bit much. In later plays, the shock was nowhere near as bad as I had a deeper understanding of how the mechanics fit together and how to quickly scan the cards for the information I needed.
Designer Maxime Tardif has posted an extensive designer diary talking about how they balanced the cards in Earth (which you can read here). While the value of each card is quite variable based on the goals of each game and other cards that it may interact with, you can be comforted by the thought that even if you throw away a good card, the rest you keep should be somewhat balanced.
Earth has a massive amount of variability ensuring that no two games you play will be identical. With 360 unique plant cards, 32 double-sided ecosystem cards, 23 double-sided Fauna, 10 double-sided Island and Climate cards, every game will have you exploring something new. In one game I focused on building a grove of berry bushes, with each one giving benefits to my other bush plants, while in another game I focused on growing all the trees on my cards to their full height. There’s no obvious single path to victory. Instead, players who are able survey the situation and capitalize on it the most effectively will be rewarded.
I enjoyed my solo plays of Earth. It was relaxing and challenging at the same time. I love the feeling of building an engine, particularly when you happen to get all the right pieces in place and your one action cascades into mountains of points. The AI opponent has four difficulty levels to choose from, so you can make adjustments if you find yourself absolutely trouncing her. The harder difficulties don’t drastically impact how Gaia plays, just how many points she accrues and how much more benefits she earns from each of your actions. I found the Medium difficulty to be the sweet-spot where I had fun and could narrowly eke out a win. I keep looking at the harder difficulties but shying away, waiting for the day where I’m in the mood to get absolutely wrecked by Gaia.
I have to admit that I don’t think there’s too much of a difference between having a dummy player accruing points and a point goal to work toward, but it feels more engaging to see Gaia’s board grow alongside your own. I enjoy the feeling of pressure as I see the mess of cubes and trees on Gaia’s board and only being able to guess at just how many points she has and how in the world am I going to surpass her. Sometimes I’d find myself second guessing which action I should take because the benefit I would be providing to Gaia would vastly outweigh the points I would gain.
While the copy of Earth I received from Inside Up Games is a prototype so none of the components are final, I found the production charming. They chose to use hundreds of breathtakingly gorgeous photographs on the cards. I love the height of the tiny trees as they grow off the table (somewhat reminiscent of Takenoko), but take care! I shudder to think about the calamity the would be caused by carelessly bumping the table and knocking everything askew. I’ve enjoyed following the crowdfunding campaign as they reveal more about the final compontents.
One of the features that I’m really looking forward to is the neoprene play mats. Neoprene play mats isn’t something that’s really tempted me before, but I love the gorgeous imagery on these mats, and having a mat to lay your 4 x 4 tableau of cards onto would be a very nice addition.
Earth is a looker, the mechanics are fun and interesting, and it’s simultaneously relaxing and engaging. I enjoy the different difficulty levels that let me choose if I want to push myself to new heights or if I just want to wind down at the end of the day. I’d love to see Gaia get some more decks that could simulate different priorities or change how she acts in some way, but as it stands, Earth is a quality game that I’m excited to explore further.
